1/13/2024 0 Comments Manuscript centralSometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor.” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, and the editor will now have to look for other reviewers.ĥ. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it means that invitations have been sent out to reviewers, but they have not yet accepted. ![]() Once a paper passes the initial screening stage, the editor looks for peer reviewers for the paper. In such cases, it might show “Decision in Process” as the next status, and in all probability, the author will be informed of the rejection in a few days.Ĥ. Reviewer Invited: This step is optional: this step may not occur in all journals. If the manuscript does not match the scope of the journal or does not meet the standards of the journal, it will be returned without review. At this stage, the editor completes an initial screening of the manuscript, and if he/she finds it suitable for the journal, it is sent for peer review. This means that the manuscript has been assigned to an editor and is waiting for the editor’s acceptance.ģ. With Editor: This status indicates that an editor has taken charge of the manuscript. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor.Ģ. Editor Invited: This step is optional and may not occur in all journals. Manuscript submitted: This means that the manuscript has been successfully submitted and approved by the author. While each journal or publication house might use a slightly different term for each status, in general, here are the different possible statuses that the tracking system might show from submission to final acceptance or rejection:ġ. This article aims to give authors an idea of the different statuses that the tracking system displays and what each status means. In some of our previous articles, we have attempted to provide answers to questions that authors generally have about the editorial decision making process and the possible editorial decisions on a manuscript. They also become confused and nervous when they see the same status over a long period of time, or when the article status erratically fluctuates. As a result, it sometimes becomes difficult for authors to figure out what a particular status means, and this increases their anxiety. Whereas most journals provide detailed guidelines for the format of the research paper, they rarely, if ever, explain what various statuses displayed on the article tracking system denote. ![]() Post submission, authors experience a lot of anxiety, and it is natural for them to keep checking their manuscript or article status. Once a manuscript is submitted, the online article tracking system allows authors to follow the journey of their manuscript. Thus, it is a boon to authors who are no longer vulnerable to losing out on important suggestions for change before publication, merely due to cluttered email. In addition, online submission has also eliminated the need for several emails, saving the author from rummaging through different versions of the document. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |